Institute Holds the Colombian State Responsible for the Assassination of Bernardo Cuero, leader from the National Association of Displaced Afro-Colombians: Another Leader the National Protection Unit Has Failed to Protect

Colombia

The International Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights profoundly laments, denounces and repudiates the assassination on June 7 of Bernardo Cuero, Afro-Colombian leader and member of the governing board […]

For players seeking an alternative to conventional regulated platforms, casino without license offer a compelling proposition: fewer restrictions, faster sign-ups, and full access to games and withdrawals without extensive identity verification processes that traditional casinos require. Withdrawal speed and reliability are among the most important factors to evaluate at any casino, and this is particularly true for platforms without traditional licenses. The fastest payouts are typically processed through cryptocurrency wallets, which can complete transactions in under an hour. E-wallet withdrawals at these platforms are also generally faster than bank transfer options. Researching a platform's historical withdrawal performance through independent player forums and review sites provides the most reliable insight into what you can expect. While casinos without traditional licenses offer genuine advantages in terms of speed and privacy, players should approach them with informed caution. Without regulatory oversight, there is no external authority to turn to in case of disputes regarding withheld winnings or unfair game outcomes. Due diligence is essential – researching player reviews, checking for transparent game audits, and verifying the platform's withdrawal track record before making significant deposits are all important steps toward a safer experience. One of the primary reasons players gravitate toward unlicensed or alternatively licensed casinos is the elimination of KYC procedures. Know Your Customer requirements at traditional casinos can delay withdrawals for days or even weeks while documents are reviewed. Platforms that operate without these requirements allow players to register with just an email address or a cryptocurrency wallet, and begin playing immediately. For players who value their privacy and want instant access to their winnings, this streamlined approach is highly appealing. Bonuses and promotions at casinos without traditional licenses can be particularly generous, as these platforms compete aggressively for player attention without the marketing restrictions that licensed operators sometimes face. Welcome bonuses, reload offers, free spins, and cashback promotions are all common features. However, players should always carefully read the terms attached to any bonus, as wagering requirements and withdrawal limits determine the actual value of any promotional offer regardless of where the casino is licensed. Casinos without a traditional license typically operate under alternative frameworks, including cryptocurrency-based platforms that leverage blockchain technology to ensure transparency and fairness without relying on conventional gambling authorities. These platforms use provably fair algorithms that allow any player to independently verify the outcome of every game, providing a form of technological accountability that replaces regulatory oversight. For tech-savvy players who understand blockchain mechanics, this represents a genuinely innovative approach to fair gaming. Ultimately, finding the right casino without a traditional license requires the same careful evaluation you would apply to any online gambling platform: checking player reviews, verifying withdrawal reliability, understanding bonus terms, and ensuring that the games offered are genuinely fair. The platforms that perform well on all these measures earn the trust of their players through consistent quality and transparency, demonstrating that regulatory licenses are not the only path to a trustworthy casino experience.

The International Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights profoundly laments, denounces and repudiates the assassination on June 7 of Bernardo Cuero, Afro-Colombian leader and member of the governing board of the National Association of Displaced Afro-Colombians (AFRODES).

Bernardo’s critical security situation, itself a result of his and his family’s displacement due to violence associated with the armed conflict, had been documented and denounced at the national and international levels. In October 2013, he appeared in a public hearing before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to report on his own security situation and those of other AFRODES members. At the hearing, Bernardo spoke of his own case, saying, “despite the denouncement of each occurrence, there are no investigations or findings for any of them.” He also spoke of his role as an Afro-Colombian human rights defender and its relation to the security threats he received, adding: “To demand respect for our right to conduct our advocacy work on behalf of our communities cannot be a reason to condemn us and our families to death.” In fact, after the hearing, threats and attacks increased against him, as well as against Erlendy Cuero Bravo, Vice-President of AFRODES. More recently, in March, in a public hearing before the Commission requested by the Colombian state to discuss the topic of threats against social leaders, the Institute again denounced the critical security situation of AFRODES leaders, including Bernardo, for whom the state had continued to deny protection measures. The failure to provide this necessary protection places the responsibility for Bernardo’s death on the state of Colombia.

In this heinous attack, the assailants tracked Bernardo to his home in Malambo, in the Department of Atlántico. All the details of the attack have yet to be made public, but one thing remains clear: the Colombian state systematically denied Bernardo adequate protection measures, despite the numerous requests made after several threats and attempts on his life. As in the cases of other social leaders, the results of the risk assessment found—absurdly—that the level of risk he faced was “ordinary.” The “risk assessment” process has been a failure and it has failed one more leader. Bernardo had said—as other leaders facing similar situations had said as well—that the only way the Colombian state would recognize that an extraordinary risk existed would be if “they killed you.”

With this most recent assassination of an AFRODES member, the Institute demands that the Colombian state undertake an immediate investigation of the crime and provide reparations and protection for Bernardo’s family. Moreover, the state must immediately provide protective measures to all AFRODES members and accept responsibility for its failure to act in Bernardo’s case and those of his colleagues.

The Institute also calls on international human rights institutions and members of the international community who support peacebuilding efforts in Colombia to forcefully urge the Colombian state to investigate the crime against Bernardo and to immediately grant the necessary individual and collective protective measures to AFRODES and other organizations representing Colombia’s ethnic communities.

Lastly, we urgently request that the Colombian state comply with Precautionary Measure 658-16 granted to Erlendy Cuero Bravo, Vice-President of AFRODES. At the same time, we urge the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the UN Special Procedures and the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to continue to monitor and act in favor of the protection of human rights defenders in Colombia, given that the state of Colombia and its institutions, through indifference and failure to act in the face of attacks and assassinations of Afro-Colombians, have been unable to protect those who defend their people’s territory, world view, and human rights.

Join Our Efforts

Help empower individuals and communities to achieve structural changes in Latin America.