Supporting the Visiblity of Afro-Panamanians in National Statistics

For players seeking an alternative to conventional regulated platforms, casino without license offer a compelling proposition: fewer restrictions, faster sign-ups, and full access to games and withdrawals without extensive identity verification processes that traditional casinos require. Withdrawal speed and reliability are among the most important factors to evaluate at any casino, and this is particularly true for platforms without traditional licenses. The fastest payouts are typically processed through cryptocurrency wallets, which can complete transactions in under an hour. E-wallet withdrawals at these platforms are also generally faster than bank transfer options. Researching a platform's historical withdrawal performance through independent player forums and review sites provides the most reliable insight into what you can expect. While casinos without traditional licenses offer genuine advantages in terms of speed and privacy, players should approach them with informed caution. Without regulatory oversight, there is no external authority to turn to in case of disputes regarding withheld winnings or unfair game outcomes. Due diligence is essential – researching player reviews, checking for transparent game audits, and verifying the platform's withdrawal track record before making significant deposits are all important steps toward a safer experience. One of the primary reasons players gravitate toward unlicensed or alternatively licensed casinos is the elimination of KYC procedures. Know Your Customer requirements at traditional casinos can delay withdrawals for days or even weeks while documents are reviewed. Platforms that operate without these requirements allow players to register with just an email address or a cryptocurrency wallet, and begin playing immediately. For players who value their privacy and want instant access to their winnings, this streamlined approach is highly appealing. Bonuses and promotions at casinos without traditional licenses can be particularly generous, as these platforms compete aggressively for player attention without the marketing restrictions that licensed operators sometimes face. Welcome bonuses, reload offers, free spins, and cashback promotions are all common features. However, players should always carefully read the terms attached to any bonus, as wagering requirements and withdrawal limits determine the actual value of any promotional offer regardless of where the casino is licensed. Casinos without a traditional license typically operate under alternative frameworks, including cryptocurrency-based platforms that leverage blockchain technology to ensure transparency and fairness without relying on conventional gambling authorities. These platforms use provably fair algorithms that allow any player to independently verify the outcome of every game, providing a form of technological accountability that replaces regulatory oversight. For tech-savvy players who understand blockchain mechanics, this represents a genuinely innovative approach to fair gaming. Ultimately, finding the right casino without a traditional license requires the same careful evaluation you would apply to any online gambling platform: checking player reviews, verifying withdrawal reliability, understanding bonus terms, and ensuring that the games offered are genuinely fair. The platforms that perform well on all these measures earn the trust of their players through consistent quality and transparency, demonstrating that regulatory licenses are not the only path to a trustworthy casino experience.

Washington, D.C., March 13, 2018. The Institute on Race, Equality, and Human Rights participated in a workshop on March 8-10, 2018 in Panama City, Panama; along with the Professor Mr. Carlos Viafara as well as Panamanian activists. Mr. Carlos Viafara is one of the few Afro-descendent academics in Latin America who studies the inclusion of ethnicity questions in the censuses of the region. He is known for his studies of official statistical data on Afro-descendent and indigenous populations in the Americas. Additionally, he has supported strengthening Afro-Colombian organizations in this area.

Mr. Viafara participated in the workshop on Friday, March 9, in the United Nations buildings in Cayton, along with the National Secretariat for the Development of Afro-Panamanians (SENADAP, for its initials in Spanish), headed by Ms. Urenna Best and the National Institute for Statistics and Census (INEC, for its initials in Spanish) represented by Mr. Roboan Gonzalez. The workshop was directed at members of the Afro-Panamanian Work Table and other Afro-Panamanian activists and was designed to continue promoting dialogue about the experience and best practices developed in Latin America on including ethnic questions in censuses and surveys. Activists were also able to state their concerns over the Panamanian Census process and have those concerns addressed. This was especially significant for members of the Work Table, who are responsible along with the INEC for designing the racial/ethnic self-identification question for Afro-descendants.

Mr. Viafora emphasized the need to design one or two questions that would allow the person being surveyed to identify themselves by terms describing cultural and phenotypical characteristics, such characteristics of the community they identify with most. This would ensure that self-recognition questions are understood by those being surveyed and reflect the reality of the country. Additionally, Mr. Viafora said that collecting official statistical data on Afro-descendants represents a significant contribution to the three pillars of the International Decade for Peoples of African Descent. This data is necessary to reduce social inequality because it is used by States when creating socio-economic policies. These policies must take into account accurate population numbers in order to have significant effects.

Mr. Roboan Gonazlez from the INEC gave an analysis of the history of the racial/ethnic self-identification questions and its results from the days of colonization until the present. He also presented a first look at a draft of the question and responses that will be included in surveys in March and August 2018. The draft question incorporated some of the changes demanded by the Work Table, such as the inclusion of Afro-descendent and “moreno” (brown skin) ethnic names and categories. The workshop participants took special note of this, given that it is a key element for educating communities and activists who may not have knowledge of this information.

Through this workshop, participants were informed of the Panamanian Government’s initiative to include the racial/ethnic question in administrative registries, including health and transit agencies as well as prisons. This is being done without coordinating with the INEC, according to Mr. Gonzalez.

Workshop participants presented their complaints to the INEC representative about the lack of availability of the post-census and post-survey results specific to the Afro-descendant population. This information should be open to the public and available on the INEC’s website.

Race and Equality will continue to support the participation of Afro-Panamanian organizations in the process of inter-institutional dialogue and education for the development of a survey that will allow for the accurate identification of the Afro-Panamanian population.

Join Our Efforts

Help empower individuals and communities to achieve structural changes in Latin America.