Os caça-níqueis com tema de dinheiro e recompensas continuam entre os favoritos dos jogadores brasileiros, e não é difícil entender o motivo: visuais chamativos, mecânicas simples e a promessa de multiplicadores generosos criam uma experiência divertida mesmo para quem está começando no mundo dos slots online.

O Сash mania segue essa linha, trazendo um layout colorido, símbolos clássicos de cassino e rodadas bônus que podem aumentar significativamente os ganhos durante a sessão de jogo. A jogabilidade é intuitiva, com controles simples de aposta e giro automático disponíveis para quem prefere um ritmo mais rápido.

A volatilidade do jogo tende a ser moderada, equilibrando ganhos frequentes de menor valor com a chance ocasional de rodadas bônus mais recompensadoras. Isso torna o slot acessível tanto para quem joga por diversão quanto para quem busca sessões mais longas com um saldo controlado.

Como em qualquer jogo de cassino online, é recomendável testar a versão demo antes de apostar dinheiro real, além de verificar se o cassino escolhido para jogar possui licença válida e processos de pagamento transparentes.

Afro-descendant organizations brief UN experts on the structural challenges faced by the Afro-descendant population in Mexico

Afro-descendant organizations brief UN experts on the structural challenges faced by the Afro-descendant population in Mexico

Washington, D.C., May 20, 2026. – During the official visit to Mexico by the United Nations Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, civil society organizations, community leaders, and representatives of African descent from different regions of the country shared with the international experts their main concerns, challenges, and demands regarding human rights, recognition, political participation, racial justice, and sustainable development.

The official visit, which began on May 11 and will conclude on May 20, is led by Isabelle Mamadou, chair of the Working Group, and Catherine Namakula, a member of the mechanism. During their stay in the country, the experts have examined the human rights situation of people of African descent in Mexico, gathering information on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related forms of intolerance, as well as promoting the implementation of the Second International Decade for People of African Descent (2025–2034).

The delegation held meetings with government authorities, national institutions, representatives of the legislative and judicial branches, as well as with people of African descent, civil society organizations, and other actors working on issues of racial discrimination and human rights.

The Institute on Race, Equality, and Human Rights (Race & Equality) had the honor of supporting the coordination of dialogue spaces and meetings between experts and activists of African descent in the various regions visited. These spaces were made possible thanks to the commitment, leadership, and mobilization capacity of Afro-descendant community leaders who brought together organizations, community authorities, youth, women, human rights defenders, and representatives from various sectors of their communities to engage in dialogue with the United Nations experts. Race & Equality extends special thanks to Rosa María Hernández Fitta in Córdoba and Yanga (Veracruz); Teresa Mojica and the members of Afrocaracolas in Puerto Marqués (Guerrero); Sergio Peñaloza in Cuajinicuilapa (Guerrero); and Yolanda Camacho in El Azufre (Oaxaca), whose work in coordinating local efforts made possible the broad and diverse participation of the Afro-descendant population. Without their commitment and leadership, these meetings would not have been possible.

The activities began on May 13, 2026, with a meeting held at the Center for Constitutional Studies and Legal Knowledge of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, represented on this occasion by Dr. Gema Tabares.

During the meetings, the main concerns raised by Afro-descendant organizations and communities highlighted that:

Although there has been institutional progress aimed at the Afro-Mexican population, these efforts remain insufficient due to budgetary constraints, a lack of political will, and a predominantly indigenous-focused approach that does not fully address the realities, identities, and specific needs of Afro-descendant peoples and communities.

In this regard, the need was reiterated to create an institution dedicated exclusively to the Afro-descendant population, with adequate resources, trained staff, and the capacity to implement comprehensive and sustainable public policies.

Likewise, the organizations emphasized the urgency of strengthening affirmative action and ensuring genuine political representation for people of African descent in decision-making spaces. They expressed concern over the constant attempts to seize candidacies intended for Afro-Mexicans and over the use of the census as the sole mechanism for verifying Afro-descendant status, despite the low level of self-identification resulting from centuries of historical invisibility and racial discrimination.

The organizations also highlighted the need to advance the recognition of the autonomy and self-determination of Afro-descendant peoples and communities, as well as their own normative systems, forms of organization, and self-governance.

Likewise, they expressed concern over the lack of specific consultation protocols for Afro-Mexican peoples, the absence of numerous communities from the National Catalog of Afro-Mexican Communities, and the stalling of discussions regarding an Afro-Mexican regulatory law that would translate constitutionally recognized rights into public policies, protection mechanisms, and concrete guarantees.

The organizations denounced that the Afro-Mexican population continues to face significant barriers to accessing inclusive education free from discrimination. Among the main concerns highlighted was the absence of Afro-Mexican content and curricula in classrooms, a situation that contributes to the historical erasure of the contributions of the Afro-descendant population and perpetuates racial stereotypes.

Likewise, they pointed out the lack of effective access to technical and university education for many communities of African descent. Even when families make significant financial efforts to ensure their children can pursue higher education, obstacles to accessing decent jobs persist due to discriminatory practices and structural racism in the labor market.

The organizations also denounced that racial profiling remains a daily reality for many people of African descent, particularly when they leave their ancestral communities. They are frequently perceived as foreigners or migrants due to their physical characteristics, facing acts of discrimination, questions about their nationality, and differential treatment by authorities and private individuals.

The organizations underscored the importance of incorporating an intersectional approach in analyzing the human rights situation of the Afro-descendant population in Mexico. They highlighted that Afro-descendant women continue to face multiple forms of discrimination stemming from the intersection of racism and sexism, as well as higher levels of economic exclusion, violence, and barriers to accessing spaces for participation and leadership.

For their part, youth of African descent face specific obstacles related to access to quality education, employment, opportunities for social mobility, and political participation, in addition to frequently being affected by criminalization, stigmatization, and violence.

Likewise, the situation of Afro-descendant migrants was highlighted, as they face heightened forms of discrimination and vulnerability due to the convergence of factors such as race, nationality, immigration status, and socioeconomic exclusion.

Another issue addressed was the protection of Afro-descendant cultural heritage, particularly Afro-Seminole, an English-based creole language spoken by the Mascoga community in Coahuila and currently in danger of extinction.

The organizations also highlighted the need to strengthen and support community initiatives aimed at preserving Afro-descendant historical memory, including community museums such as the Afro-Mexican Museum of Huehuetán, cultural spaces, and artistic projects that play a fundamental role in building identity, collective self-esteem, and the fight against invisibility. However, they noted that these initiatives continue to receive scant institutional and financial support.

Afro-descendant communities in coastal areas also warned of the impacts of climate change, the state’s neglect, and economic projects that are affecting their territories and livelihoods, especially in places like Puerto Marqués, in Acapulco, and El Azufre, in Oaxaca.

In addition, they denounced the impacts of violence and organized crime, including disappearances, murders, intimidation, and lack of access to justice.

The activists also highlighted the urgent need for adequately equipped health centers with permanent staff. Currently, many people of African descent must travel long distances to access medical care or resort to high-cost private services, a situation that seriously limits the exercise of the right to health.

They also expressed concern that many government programs and support initiatives establish requirements that are inaccessible to Afro-descendant communities, organizations, and activists, thereby excluding precisely those who most need access to these resources.

The participating organizations emphasized the importance of the Working Group’s recommendations contributing to the strengthening of the recognition, protection, and effective guarantee of the rights of people of African descent in Mexico, from a perspective of historical reparations, racial justice, substantive equality, and effective community participation.

Today, May 20, 2026, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent will present its preliminary observations and recommendations during a press conference at the conclusion of its official visit to Mexico. Subsequently, the final report on the mission is expected to be presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council, possibly in September 2026.

Race & Equality reaffirms its commitment to continue accompanying and supporting the Afro-descendant population in Mexico, as it has done for many years, by promoting spaces for dialogue, strengthening the capacities of Afro-descendant organizations and leaders, advancing national and international advocacy processes, and contributing to the defense of their human rights.

We are confident that the conclusions and recommendations resulting from this visit will help shed light on the challenges that people, peoples, and communities of African descent in Mexico continue to face, as well as strengthen the actions necessary to advance toward racial equality, historical reparations, full recognition of their rights, and effective participation in the country’s political, economic, social, and cultural life.

 

We also spoke with the migrant community, but I changed the term to “Afri-Mexican”

 

The activists deserve recognition because, without financial support, they managed to organize the community and give the experts a warm welcome, covering the logistical costs.

 

I think it’s important to note these dates

United Nations Permanent Forum on People of African Descent to hold regional consultation in Bogotá

Bogotá, September 16, 2025. This Friday, September 19, the United Nations Permanent Forum on People of African Descent will hold a regional consultation for Spanish-speaking Latin America, a space that is part of the process of drafting the future United Nations Declaration on the respect, protection, and fulfillment of the human rights of people of African descent.

This meeting, which will begin at 9 a.m. at the headquarters of the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and will bring together more than 60 leaders, is part of the regional consultations being conducted by the Permanent Forum in different parts of the world to gather input and ensure that the voices of Afro-descendant communities are taken into account in the drafting of the Declaration. The meeting in Bogotá will be the second regional consultation, following the one held in December 2024 in Barbados, which focused on the Caribbean.

According to the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), around 200 million people of African descent live in the region, equivalent to 30% of the total population. However, structural barriers persist that limit their access to justice, political participation, education, health, and decent employment. These gaps are even greater in the case of women of African descent, who face the intersectional effects of racism and sexism. The regional consultation in Bogotá, aimed at Afro-descendant communities in Spanish-speaking Latin American countries, seeks to generate an assessment of the multiple forms of discrimination and structural racism in the region, while consolidating proposals to strengthen the draft Declaration.

The event, which will take the form of a broad and participatory dialogue, will focus on priority issues identified by the Permanent Forum, including: the recognition and addressing of systemic and structural racism; restorative justice in the face of the legacies of colonialism, slavery, apartheid, and genocide; the collective rights of Afro-descendant peoples; sustainable development and the reduction of inequalities; as well as urgent and emerging human rights issues, such as the impact of artificial intelligence, climate change, environmental injustice, and the need to reform the international economic order.

The Institute on Race, Equality, and Human Rights (Race and Equality) supports the participation of prominent women leaders from the region, who will contribute their experiences and expertise to the discussion. Among them are: Paola Yánez from Bolivia, coordinator of the Network of Afro-Latin American, Afro-Caribbean, and Diaspora Women; Mirtha Colón from Honduras, president of the Central American Black Organization (ONECA); María Bizenny Martínez from the Dominican Republic, coordinator of the Human Rights and Political Advocacy Department at MOSCTHA; Luz Marina Becerra Panesso from Colombia, legal representative of the Coordination of Displaced Afro-Colombian Women in Resistance (La Comadre); and Teresa Mojica from Mexico, president of the Petra Morga Afro-Mexican Foundation. Their participation will raise awareness of the specific realities faced by women of African descent in the face of racial violence, forced displacement, and exclusion.

Voices of the diaspora: Women of African descent in resistance and global leadership

As a prelude to the consultation, on Thursday, September 18, at 4:00 p.m., at the Hotel Suite Jones (Chapinero, Bogotá), a dialogue will be held entitled Voices of the Diaspora: Women of African Descent in Resistance and Global Leadership. This meeting will feature the participation of the aforementioned leaders and Professor Justin Hasford, a member of the UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent, whose career in the United States and involvement with Afro-descendant movements in the diaspora will allow for a comparative analysis between Latin America and the Global North.

The event, organized by Raza e Igualdad, will have simultaneous English-Spanish interpretation and seeks to consolidate a space for exchange and collective construction, strengthening the link between the historical struggles of Afro-descendant communities in Latin America and those that are developing in other international contexts.



Recent Reforms Intensify Political Persecution in Nicaragua and Exile, Warns the OHCHR

Geneva, December 9, 2024 – “A severe and repressive climate prevails in Nicaragua,” stated Nada Al-Nashif, the UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, during her oral update on the human rights situation before the United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday, December 9. In her statement, Al-Nashif warned that recent legal and constitutional reforms are consolidating power in the presidency and “paving the way for greater political persecution,” including against Nicaraguans in exile.

The Deputy High Commissioner noted that the recent legal reforms redefine crimes to include social media posts that “incite panic” or threaten “social stability.” They also classify cybercrimes as organized, authorize asset confiscation, and allow unrestricted access to personal data without police oversight.

The constitutional reforms approved by the National Assembly last month will increase executive interference in the legislative, judicial, and electoral branches. Al-Nashif described as “particularly atrocious” the removal of the explicit recognition of the prohibition of torture.

These changes aim to expand and strengthen government powers to strip people of their citizenship and confiscate assets, a tool already widely used to arbitrarily repress government critics and dissidents. Since February 2023, at least 546 people have been deprived of their nationality, had their assets confiscated, and been exposed to statelessness. Many of these individuals cannot renew their documentation, hindering their connection to their country. In addition, the Supreme Court stripped 135 former political prisoners of their nationality and assets, and exiled them to Guatemala in September.

Constant Pattern of Arbitrary Detentions, Torture, and Forced Disappearances

The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has documented a consistent pattern of arbitrary detentions, torture, and forced disappearances. Currently, 76 people remain in detention for political reasons, including 20 indigenous people, and 30 individuals were arbitrarily detained in late November. Regarding forced disappearances, OHCHR highlighted the forced disappearance of Angélica Chavarría, a companion of the late retired General Humberto Ortega, since May 2024; the disappearance of Brooklyn Rivera, a member of the National Assembly from the indigenous YATAMA party, since September 2023; the disappearance of Steadman Fagoth Müller, presidential advisor on indigenous affairs, since September 2024; and the former colonel Victor Boitano (63 years old), who has been missing since April 2024.

“Forced disappearance, torture, and ill-treatment must cease unequivocally,” urged the Deputy High Commissioner.

Indigenous Peoples Exposed to Violence

The Deputy High Commissioner expressed deep concern over the ongoing attacks on indigenous peoples in the Autonomous Region of the North Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua, fueled by violence from settlers or non-indigenous third parties. The murder of two Miskitos on November 8, and reports of sexual violence against indigenous children allegedly committed by settlers, reflect the severe insecurity they face.

The Deputy High Commissioner called for the immediate release of eight Mayangna rangers who have been detained in extreme conditions since 2021, “Authorities must take proactive measures to prevent violence, including sexual violence, and conduct thorough and independent investigations into all these incidents, holding perpetrators accountable.”

Finally, the Deputy High Commissioner called on “the international community, including all States committed to the region and those with influence, to intensify their efforts to support these objectives.” The Office also reiterated its commitment to providing technical assistance to Nicaragua.

Council Members Concerned about Nicaragua’s “Co-Presidency”

In the interactive dialogue with the Deputy High Commissioner, Council members and civil society organizations called for the immediate release of political prisoners, annulment of their judicial processes, restoration of citizens’ rights, and the lifting of restrictions on NGOs, media, and religious groups. Several delegations, including Peru, Canada, Costa Rica, Paraguay, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, among others, expressed deep concern over the recent legal and constitutional reforms, particularly the establishment of a “co-presidency” that centralizes power in one family.

“It is concerning to see the explicit elimination of powers, now simply referred to as organs, and the ability of the new co-presidents to coordinate with absolute and unlimited power… This new attack on Nicaraguan institutions must inevitably be interpreted as a near-final blow to democracy,” stated the Costa Rican delegation.

The United Kingdom described the recent constitutional reforms as “an additional tragic chapter in the deterioration of political civil rights and other human rights of Nicaraguans,” and called on Nicaraguan authorities to accept the recommendations made in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR).

Canada urged the renewal of the High Commissioner’s and the Group of Experts’ mandates in March 2025. The European Union called on Nicaragua to expand its cooperation with both mandates and other human rights mechanisms “to fulfill its reporting obligations under the treaties it has ratified.”

From civil society organizations’ microphones, Tininiska Rivera, daughter of indigenous deputy Brooklyn Rivera, and Ingni Fagoth, daughter of Miskito leader Steadman Fagoth, denounced the forced disappearances of their fathers.

Tininiska also denounced the cancellation of the legal personality of the YATAMA party and the Moravian Church, as well as the illegal occupation of indigenous territories by armed settlers. She also pointed to the rise in violence against indigenous communities in 2024, including the murder of four rangers, the criminalization of 37, and the disappearance of indigenous leaders.

Ingni warned that her father’s detention by the Nicaraguan Army is part of a systematic and widespread attack against indigenous peoples for political reasons. “We demand justice… Our people are standing, but we need the support of the international community. Do not abandon Nicaragua’s indigenous people,” she urged.

Other organizations highlighted the arbitrary closure of more than 5,000 NGOs, 12 repressive laws passed in the past four months, 222 documented cases of torture, 452 cases of people arbitrarily stripped of their nationality, and the unemployment of at least 1,200 teachers and university staff, among others.

Statement

The oral update by the Deputy High Commissioner and the subsequent interventions by States and civil society organizations make it clear that the human rights crisis in Nicaragua has reached one of its most critical points. In this grave context, the Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality) supports the call by the Deputy High Commissioner to the international community to intensify efforts in support of the Nicaraguan population, with special attention to those in exile, indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples, and those who remain deprived of liberty for political reasons.

Impunity cannot prevail in the face of the systematic and severe human rights violations occurring in the country. We call on the United Nations and States committed to democracy and human rights to strengthen monitoring and protection mechanisms and to vote in favor of renewing the mandate of the Group of Experts on Human Rights in Nicaragua (GHREN) in 2025. This mandate is essential for deepening the documentation of human rights violations, ensuring accountability, and strengthening international pressure in defense of the Nicaraguan population.

UPR Nicaragua 2024: Race and Equality calls for strong recommendations in the face of systematic human rights violations in Nicaragua

Geneva, November 12, 2024.- The State of Nicaragua will be evaluated in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council tomorrow, Wednesday, November 13. The Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality) urges the participating States of this space to make forceful recommendations in the face of the systematic violations that the State of Nicaragua continues to commit to the detriment of justice, peace, constitutional order, and human rights in the context of the violent repression carried out after the protests of April 2018.

During the last four-year cycle, Nicaragua has shown total contempt for the recommendations of international human rights protection mechanisms, as well as the resolutions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, maintaining an environment of repression and violation of fundamental rights, particularly for human rights defenders, women, journalists, and indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples.

In Nicaragua, human rights defenders are the target of state repression, despite the fact that the state claims to promote, defend, and protect constitutional guarantees and human rights. International organizations have documented at least 2,000 arbitrary detentions, and cases of torture and forced disappearances against people considered opponents, activists and critical journalists. According to the Mechanism for the Recognition of Political Prisoners of Nicaragua, 46 people are currently deprived of liberty for political reasons, including three indigenous leaders from the Caribbean Coast: Nancy Henríquez, Brooklyn Rivera, and Steadman Fagot.

The Group of Human Rights Experts on Nicaragua (GHREN) has also highlighted the expulsion and deprivation of Nicaraguan nationality of people considered critical of the regime, as well as the confiscation of their property and the restriction of access to Nicaraguan territory, in addition to facts and circumstances that constitute crimes against humanity. “particularly, persecution for political reasons.”

Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples continue to suffer invasions by settlers (non-indigenous third parties) without adequate state protection. The lack of implementation of the sanitation process for the eviction of illegal occupants has generated forced cohabitation between settlers and indigenous people, which has resulted in violent conflicts, forced displacements and murders of members of indigenous communities. In the first six months of 2024 alone, 643 cases of human rights violations were registered in these territories.

In addition, the State grants concessions for mining and agro-industrial activities without free, prior and informed consultations, which causes serious environmental damage and violates the rights of indigenous communities. These communities rarely benefit from the profits generated by such projects, thus perpetuating poverty and exclusion.

The absence of effective promotion and protection of women’s rights remains an alarming concern, especially in the face of the increase in cases of violence and femicide in the country. The lack of adequate response by the authorities to complaints of gender-based violence discourages victims from seeking justice. According to the Observatory of Catholics for the Right to Decide, so far in 2024 there have been 63 femicides.

It should be noted that government policies on gender are designed centrally, without consultation or effective participation of feminist organizations and rights defenders, who instead face state repression, criminalization, and harassment. This restriction of women’s participation in decision-making has resulted in a lack of sex education programmes and effective prevention of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.

In the area of the rights to freedom of expression and association, the Nicaraguan State has approved regulations, such as the Cybercrimes Law and its recent reform and the Foreign Agents Law, which limit fundamental freedoms by allowing state surveillance and the criminalization of activism and journalism. As a result, at least 278 independent journalists have left the country for fear of reprisals, according to the Foundation for Freedom of Expression and Democracy (FLED).

Likewise, through these laws, the State has annulled the legal status of more than 5,000 organizations, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provided health, education, and support services to vulnerable communities. With the disappearance of these organizations, entire communities have been left without access to social and health programs that depended on the work of NGOs, generating a direct impact on the well-being of the most vulnerable sectors.

Finally, the State of Nicaragua has a confrontational, non-collaborative stance and repeatedly despises spaces for dialogue in the name of “national sovereignty”, in addition to its rejection of accountability in the international arena. The State has ignored recommendations from international protection bodies and mechanisms and rulings of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in disregard of its international obligations.

It has also expelled international organizations such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) from the country, and has withdrawn from the Organization of American States (OAS). Finally, in the last two years Nicaragua has not submitted to the reviews of United Nations Treaty Bodies, such as the Committee Against Torture (CAT) or the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and in other cases, it has withdrawn as happened during the interactive dialogue with the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. making unfounded accusations against the treaty body and its members.

For all of the above, within the framework of the Fourth Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality) urges the member states of the Human Rights Council to issue firm and effective recommendations that oblige the State of Nicaragua to comply with its international commitments in the field of human rights. Only

through coordinated and determined action will it be possible to generate true accountability and contribute to restoring justice, peace and respect for fundamental rights in the country.

We demand that the State of Nicaragua cease political persecution, immediately release all persons deprived of liberty for political reasons, restore the independence of the powers of the State, allow the work of human rights organizations and comply with its international commitments.

Bisexual recognition and visibility: Obstacles Faced by Bisexual People

Washington DC, September 23, 2024.- Every year, International Day of Bisexual Visibility offers a crucial opportunity, at the global level, for the recognition of bisexual identities as an important part of sexual and gender diversity. The Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality) values and honors bisexual human rights defenders who contribute to bisexual visibility, challenging binarisms and stigmas and addressing barriers that limit equal access to opportunities and the exercise of their basic rights.

Despite progress in the fight for LGBTI+ rights, bisexual people continue to face discrimination and violence in various areas of their lives, from access to public office to care in the health sector, to bullying in schools and difficulties in being recognized in activist spaces.

Obstacles to access to public office

Bisexual people often face a notable lack of representation in public office. This deficit perpetuates the invisibility and negative stereotypes that affect their lives. The perception that bisexuality is a “phase” or identity that is less legitimate than others contributes to the exclusion of bisexual people from positions of influence and decision-making. Liandra Paz, Coordinator of the Majorie Marchi Critical Training School project of the Conexão G de Cidadania LGBTI group in favelas in Brazil, gave an example: “A bisexual person who held public office was Marielle Franco, a Rio de Janeiro councilwoman, whose sexual orientation is often mistakenly reduced to that of a lesbian woman, even though she was a bisexual woman. Marielle is constantly referred to as a lesbian, reflecting the difficulty society has in recognizing the complexity and legitimacy of bisexual identities. After her death, Marielle’s own family publicly claimed her bisexuality, fighting against the elimination of this fundamental part of her identity.”

This lack of representation ends up exacerbating structural barriers and limiting the ability of bisexual people to advocate for specific policies. “Therefore, the fight for bisexual visibility, both in the political space and in society in general, is vital. The representation of parliamentarians like Marielle Franco not only broadens the scope of public policies aimed at LGBTQIA+ rights, but also directly confronts the systematic elimination of bisexuality,” she concluded.

Challenges in the health sector

“When it comes to the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, the education and resources available are often not adapted to our realities. When I routinely ask for sexual health screenings, it is assumed that this is because I am bisexual, which means to them “being promiscuous.” Honestly, I prefer to read and look for information on my own; and save myself the trouble or the feeling of being singled out in front of a stranger due to my sexual orientation,” said Ana Gómez, an independent bisexual activist from Colombia.

Across the region, health professionals often lack adequate training to address the specific needs of bisexual people, and health research excludes their experiences, as the 2018 communiqué by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and United Nations human rights experts points out, making it impossible to understand their issues. As a result, bisexual people face inadequate care, misdiagnosis, lack of understanding, and suffer discrimination and abuse. Access to and quality of care in the health sector are critical areas that States still need to work to improve. “Although health is a constitutional right in Colombia, in practice, accessing quality services has become a privilege. (…) for those who live in rural areas, this situation is even more complicated as they face greater barriers to access and such strong stigmatization that there is often no space or energy to self-identify as bisexual,” Ana said. This context not only puts the physical and mental health of bisexual people at risk but also perpetuates inequality.

Biphobic bullying in schools

Bullying of bisexual students often takes the form of derogatory comments, humiliation, exclusion, and psychological and physical aggression, which not only negatively impacts emotional and academic well-being, but also contributes to a culture of silence and fear that reinforces invisibility. “It is very important to include bisexual experiences and to be mentioned in curricula and academic conversations, educating about sexual and gender diversity that has nothing to do with monosexuality,” said Fhran Medina, a bisexual lawyer with Fraternidad Trans Masculino Perú.

It is, therefore, essential that States adopt national policies to ensure that children, adolescents, and young people, regardless of their sexual orientation, can learn and develop in a safe and respectful environment.

Barriers in spaces of activism and social struggle

In many cases, after running away from home to preserve their physical and mental integrity, bisexual people seek refuge in organized LGBTI+ spaces, Cristiana Huerta, President of the Las Malcriadas Feminist Association in Nicaragua, told us. However, they find that they are not fully understood due to the gender binary. They are often excluded or minimized for their contributions to LGBTI+ movements due to the belief that their identity is not “relevant enough”.

The Cuban editor, Karla Ma. Pérez González, agrees, stating that “bisexual people, as in many other countries, are invisible and are lost within the acronym LGBTI+. I would have to say that in recent years there has been a remarkable, social change in attitudes towards LGBTQ+ people.” In addition, she pointed out that Cuban official policy has taken some initiatives, but only to ingratiate itself at the international level and not in the real interest of a paradigm shift. “Discrimination is still something that happens daily and we cannot forget the regime’s repressive history towards sexual dissidents,” she emphasized.

This lack of recognition limits bisexual people’s ability to influence the LGBTI+ agenda and position their demands and strategies in activism. For this reason, at Race and Equality, we believe that only the representation and authentic participation of bisexual people in spaces of advocacy and the struggle for human rights will achieve real progress towards equity.

Recommendations for States

To address the challenges and ensure the rights of bisexual people are respected, the United Nations and various human rights organizations recommend that States:

  1. Investigate and prosecute acts of violence, torture, and ill-treatment committed against bisexual people and those who defend their rights, and provide reparations to the victims of such acts.
  2. Raise awareness among healthcare providers and ensure that bisexual people and their families have access to safe and non-discriminatory health services that take into account their specific interests.
  3. Raise awareness about bisexuality through the education system and dispel negative stereotypes and prejudices through public awareness campaigns.
  4. Ensure that bisexual persons and bisexual people’s organizations are consulted in the development of research and the development of legislation and policies affecting their rights and that their participation in such processes is encouraged.
  5. Support research that collects disaggregated data on the specific situation of bisexuals, with respect to poverty, employment, housing, health, education, and access to public services.

“Nicaragua is testing the limits of the United Nations system,” experts say at a side event during the 57th session of the UN Human Rights Council

Geneva, September 13, 2024.- “Nicaragua is not only isolating itself; it is testing the limits of the United Nations system,” stated Jan Michael Simon, Chair of the Group of Human Rights Experts on Nicaragua (GHREN), during a side event organized by the Institute on Race, Equality, and Human Rights (Race and Equality), held in the context of the 57th session of the UN Human Rights Council. Simon called for coordinated advocacy from the international community, especially International Financial Institutions.

The event, titled “International Solidarity with Nicaragua: setbacks, progress, and future challenges,” was co-sponsored by CCPR, ISHR, MAM, INANA, and the embassies of Chile, Peru, Paraguay, Ecuador, Canada, Argentina, and Costa Rica in Geneva. The discussion included Nicaraguan human rights defenders, representatives of GHREN, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Special Monitoring Mechanism for Nicaragua (MESENI) of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), and delegates from allied embassies supporting the Nicaraguan people.

In her opening remarks, Chile’s Ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Claudia Fuentes-Julio, reminded attendees that the foundation of the UN Human Rights Council and the broader UN system is built on the will to cooperate and work together, and therefore, Nicaragua’s isolation is a threat. “When we have a state like Nicaragua, which cuts off political relations with the outside world while its regime remains in power due to its economic ties, we must question the true priorities of the system we are building,” she warned.

Jan-Michael Simon, Chair of GHREN, pointed out that the only area where Nicaragua is not isolating itself is in multilateral financial bodies, known as International Financial Institutions (IFIs), particularly the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He stressed that advocacy efforts must be directed at these bodies.

“We hope that the countries represented and the respective boards of these IFIs, whether it be the IMF, the Financial Action Task Force, or countries with bilateral relations with Nicaragua, take their commitments to free trade agreements seriously,” concluded the expert.

Indigenous and Afro-descendant communities targeted by the regime
According to GHREN expert Ariela Peralta, political persecution is focused on silencing any autonomous dissident voices that can organize. Peralta explained that the Indigenous and Afro-descendant communities of Nicaragua’s Caribbean Coast are a “target” of the regime’s political persecution “due to their capacity to organize and express opposition… as evidenced in both findings and historical contexts.”

Peralta lamented that among the group of 135 Nicaraguans who were released from prison and exiled to Guatemala, Indigenous leaders Brooklyn Rivera and Nancy Elizabeth Henríquez were not included. Rivera has been in a state of enforced disappearance since September 2023.

Anexa Alfred Cunningham, a Nicaraguan expert on the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and founder of the INANA Indigenous and Afro-descendant Peoples’ Platform, denounced that violence against Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples is systematic. According to INANA’s records, massacres have been a constant from 2020 to 2023. During this period, three massacres were carried out in the Mayangna Indigenous communities located in the Bosawás Biosphere Reserve, resulting in at least 20 Indigenous people killed, including women and girls who were subjected to sexual violence and torture. Alfred also lamented the recent closure of the Moravian Church, which provided assistance “in the absence of the State in matters of health and education.”

UPR is a crucial opportunity
“The exercise of fundamental rights is criminalized (in Nicaragua). For many years, terms like political advocacy or citizen participation have been punishable offenses. Demanding rights is called ‘terrorism.’ Insisting that officials and authorities comply with the law is labeled ‘undermining national integrity.’ Demanding democracy makes one a ‘coup plotter,’” denounced Azahalia Solís, a Nicaraguan human rights defender and member of the Autonomous Women’s Movement (MAM), who was arbitrarily stripped of her nationality in 2023.

Fiorella Melzi, Coordinator of MESENI, warned that “the repression has continued with even more severe manifestations against civic and democratic spaces. All of this is aimed at eliminating organized civil society and consolidating a regime with concentrated power in the Executive, orchestrated for years, based on a police state.” The Nicaraguan state continues to commit grave and systematic violations against the population, primarily due to political persecution, “or simply for being people deemed as not aligned with the government’s interests.”

Andrés Sánchez, Deputy Representative and Officer in Charge of the OHCHR Regional Office for Central America and the Dominican Republic, agreed, saying, “The situation is extremely alarming… This dismantling of the social fabric leaves thousands of people without access to essential services, exacerbating the country’s social and economic crisis.”

“In this context, I want to emphasize the importance of the upcoming Universal Periodic Review (UPR). The UPR is a crucial opportunity for states to present their recommendations to the Nicaraguan government, urging it to cease these violations and relying on the High Commissioner’s recommendations, which can serve as a solid base or guide,” he concluded.

Statement
The Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality) denounces that the Nicaraguan regime continues to use arbitrary detentions as a mechanism to silence dissenting voices. Carlos Quesada, Executive Director of Race and Equality, stated that the regime continues to resort to this practice, “keeping hundreds of people imprisoned, only to later release and exile them.” He recalled that in February 2023, 222 Nicaraguan prisoners were released and exiled, and now the regime has exiled 135 more, sending them to Guatemala. These actions destroy the lives of the affected individuals, leaving them in a state of helplessness.

Furthermore, Race and Equality urgently calls for the implementation of GHREN’s recommendation on the importance of advocating before International Financial Institutions. These institutions must recognize that crimes against humanity are being committed in Nicaragua and, consequently, implement human rights due diligence policies to identify, prevent, address, and remedy the negative impacts associated with their activities in the country.

Multifaceted Crisis in Nicaragua Requires Urgent Change of Course by the Government, Says UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

Geneva, September 4, 2024 – “The multifaceted crisis that has affected Nicaragua since 2018 requires an urgent change of course by the Government,” recommended the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, in his annual report (2023-2024) published on Tuesday, September 3, in compliance with Human Rights Council Resolution 52/2.

In his report, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) documented that the Nicaraguan government has intensified control over all state institutions and has pursued the persecution of any individual or organization acting independently or expressing dissenting opinions, including human rights defenders, independent media, and non-governmental organizations.

Officials Under the Regime’s Scrutiny

The OHCHR highlighted the severe situation within Nicaragua’s justice system, which is under the control of the Executive Branch and has enabled the persecution of individuals perceived as political opponents. According to testimonies from justice system officials before the OHCHR, there exists a climate of fear, intimidation, and harassment.

In November 2023, hundreds of officials were dismissed, allegedly due to conflicting political loyalties with different government factions. In a case documented by the OHCHR, a high-ranking official was subjected to arbitrary house arrest, and a judge had to flee the country to avoid politically motivated detention.

Sexual Violations and Abuses of Male and Female Political Prisoners

According to OHCHR data, as of last May, 131 people were under arbitrary detention, marking a significant increase compared to 54 individuals in June 2023. Notably, ten more arbitrary detentions occurred in June and July 2024.

The OHCHR raised alarms over five cases of detainees who were subjected to torture or ill-treatment, including brutal beatings, prolonged isolation, and stress or positional torture. Moreover, in the second half of 2023, the Office documented seven cases of detainees who reported being subjected to rape, sexual abuse, and electric shocks. Among the most alarming cases, three detainees reported having their testicles strangled.

The OHCHR also noted that the detention conditions for women are characterized by the use of sexual violence and gender-based violence, including death threats or threats to take their children away, deprivation of necessary medications and hygiene products, forced labor, forced nudity, rape threats, sexual abuse, and rape. Additionally, in 2023, it was documented that two- and three-month-old babies were separated from their mothers following arbitrary arrests, interrupting breastfeeding.

Forced Disappearances as a Tool of Control

The OHCHR has documented the use of forced disappearances as a tool of control. Among the cases documented is that of a 70-year-old merchant who was detained on October 10, 2023, for criticizing the Government in informal conversations in his store in Terrabona, Matagalpa. After more than a month of his whereabouts being unknown, constituting a forced disappearance, he was sentenced to seven years in prison for arms trafficking in a trial that did not guarantee his right to due process.

Another alarming case is that of a 65-year-old academic who disappeared on November 20, 2023, presumably in retaliation for a critical social media post. To date, his whereabouts remain unknown.

Forced disappearances represent a grave violation of international law and leave the victims’ families in a state of distress and uncertainty.

Expulsions and Denationalizations

In 2023, the Nicaraguan government arbitrarily stripped 317 people (60 women and 257 men) of their nationality, rendering them stateless, in clear violation of international human rights law. This action has had devastating consequences, leaving them without access to fundamental rights and essential services.

Additionally, 62 cases were documented where Nicaraguan nationals (33 women and 29 men) were denied entry to their own country. This denial occurred without prior notice, causing severe consequences such as the forced separation of families. “These expulsions and denationalizations have forced the victims to rebuild their lives far from their families, facing a situation of legal and personal insecurity,” the report cites.

Indigenous and Afro-descendant Peoples

The OHCHR has recorded multiple violations in the territories of Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples on Nicaragua’s Caribbean Coast. In July 2023, two Indigenous forest rangers from the Mayangna Sauni As territory were killed by settlers, and another Indigenous person from the same region died from injuries sustained in an attack. The authorities have not taken adequate measures to investigate these incidents or prevent future abuses.

Additionally, on October 31, 2023, and April 22, 2024, mining concessions were granted in Indigenous territories without carrying out the necessary consultations. The Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous peoples, Francisco Cali Tzay, expressed concern over the lack of information and pressure during the consultations for the Bio-CLIMA project conducted by the Government from August 18 to September 7, 2023.

On March 7, 2024, the Green Climate Fund announced that it had terminated the project due to non-compliance with its policies and procedures regarding environmental and social safeguards.

2026 Elections, “A New Opportunity for Nicaragua”

Among his recommendations, the High Commissioner urged the Government to: release all individuals arbitrarily detained in the context of the political crisis; adopt measures to prevent torture and ill-treatment in prisons; amend criminal legislation to align it with international human rights standards; ensure fair trials and due process; and restore civic and democratic spaces.

He also called on the government to ensure impartiality in the upcoming 2026 elections, which “have the potential to offer a new opportunity for Nicaragua… if they are held in a safe and conducive environment for human rights, where the right to political participation can be exercised meaningfully, and Nicaraguans are free to decide the future of their country.”

Finally, Türk urged the international community to strengthen accountability for the alleged international crimes committed since 2018 in Nicaragua, as well as to promote the appropriate application of universal and extraterritorial jurisdictions, and to “ensure that all international assistance and investments provided to Nicaragua, including through financial institutions and international companies, adopt a human rights-based approach.”

Statement

From the Institute on Race, Equality, and Human Rights (Race and Equality), we emphasize the importance of the work carried out by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Despite the Nicaraguan government’s refusal to cooperate and provide information, the Office continues to play an essential role in monitoring the crisis in Nicaragua, protecting the confidentiality of sources at risk, and issuing crucial recommendations to the Nicaraguan State and the international community to put an end to this alarming situation.

Likewise, we commend the vital role played by Nicaraguan civil society organizations. Despite the extreme risk and difficulty under which they operate, these organizations continue, with courage and determination, to report on the situation, ensuring that the world is aware of the grave human rights violations that persist in Nicaragua. Their work is indispensable for the defense of human rights and the restoration of democracy in the nation.

Finally, we demand the immediate release of all individuals imprisoned for political reasons and call for justice for all victims of the repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime.

Visit of the UN Rapporteur on Racism to Brazil: Systemic racism and violence against women from racial and ethnic groups are the highlights of her report

Brazil, September 02, 2024 – “Systemic racism demands systemic responses.” This approach was emphasized by Ashiwini K.P., United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, during her press conference where she presented the preliminary conclusions following her visit to Brazil. Between August 5 and 16, the Rapporteur visited Brasília, Salvador, São Luís, São Paulo, Florianópolis, and Rio de Janeiro, where she met with authorities of the Federal Executive Branch and state governments, as well as with various Black, Indigenous, Quilombola, and Roma organizations.

In preparation for the visit, the Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality), together with the Institute for Development and Human Rights (IDDH), organized a virtual training with civil society organizations to support them in preparing documents with recommendations that would be delivered to the Rapporteur. In addition, the scope and objectives of the visit were presented in the training to guide them in dialogue and advocacy actions before this UN special procedure.

“The visit of the Rapporteur on racism takes place at an important moment for the country, after all, we are in an election year and advocating for intersectional public policies. From our perspective, we highlight the importance of providing Brazilian organizations with a relationship between the UN and the government, because based on the report that will be presented, the State must commit to implementing reparations in matters of racism”; highlights Rodnei Jericó da Silva, Director of Race and Equality in Brazil.

 Preliminary Findings: Highlights

Race and Equality presents some of the key points of the preliminary conclusions highlighted by the Rapporteur regarding her experience in the country, which will be presented in the final report to the United Nations Human Rights Council in June 2025. This report will be delivered to the Brazilian government, which, as a member state of the UN, accepted the official visit as a way of evaluating its public policies.

In this sense, Ashiwini K.P. stressed that she identified positive points in some government actions, such as the recognition of racism as a systemic phenomenon; the creation of the Ministry of Racial Equality, the Ministry of Indigenous Peoples, and the Secretariat of Roma Peoples, within the Ministry of Racial Equality; sound affirmative policy proposals; and the existence of a health unit in Bahia for the treatment of sickle cell anemia. However, the Rapporteur emphasized that governmental progress is advancing slowly, since, recognizing that the colonialist past generates an exclusion of groups marked by structural violence, Brazil must adopt a systemic approach to guarantee restorative justice.

The lack of disaggregated data is a major issue identified by the Special Rapporteur, particularly the absence of data on Roma people, LGBTI+ people, migrants, refugees, and people with disabilities, who face multiple intersecting forms of discrimination. She also points to the growth of neo-Nazi groups, especially in Santa Catarina, where she mentioned that there is an erasure of data on the issue. Furthermore, she emphasized that Brazil must ensure that research and public policies are supported by and created through consultation with groups in vulnerable situations.

Thus, its proposals include the establishment of an independent national human rights institution following the principles on the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris Principles), to monitor and implement anti-racist policies.

The Rapporteur emphasized that the indigenous and quilombola communities have faced numerous setbacks by the National Congress. In her criticisms, she highlighted the slowness of the State in the process of territorial demarcation of these communities; the seriousness of the time-frame thesis; environmental racism as a driver of exclusion and vulnerability; and the neglect of the health of these populations in the face of the advance of illegal mining (pesticides and urban diseases). She also expressed concern about the violence suffered by indigenous peoples and quilombolas, highlighting the recent Guaraní-Kaiowá case, in Mato Grosso do Sul, and other conflicts in Bahia. Therefore, the Rapporteur urged the Government to take an urgent position in the face of intimidation against indigenous peoples and quilombolas, warning of the seriousness of the resulting environmental violence, and that more forceful actions must be taken, in addition to emphasizing Brazil’s international commitment to Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization (ILO).

“A coordinated national plan for indigenous and quilombola affairs is necessary, as the protection of their lands is essential to address the climate crisis,” said Ashiwini K.P.

The understanding of religious racism as a practice that persecutes and reproduces violence against practitioners of African-based religions was one of the highlights of her conclusions. In this regard, the Rapporteur cited cases that came to her through civil society, such as private transport that refuses to take people in their religious clothing, the loss of custody of children by Axé women, and physical attacks organized against terreiros. In her opinion, she stressed that the State allows this type of misogynistic and racist practices and suggested that the government create a protection program to face this problem.

“Even if Dial 100 exists, the lack of investment by the state sends a message of impunity and that the government will not take any action against religious racism,” she said.

Regarding the situation of human rights defenders, the Rapporteur expressed her dismay at the seriousness of the threats and police brutality to which these groups are exposed. Although she acknowledged the importance of the creation of the Sales Pimenta Technical Working Group, to develop proposals for the National Policy and Plan for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, she highlighted the lack of resources for human rights and the effectiveness of those policies that already exist. In this way, she urged Brazil to implement the actions recommended by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor, after she visited Brazil in April of this year.

Given the situation of black women and gender/sexual intersectionality, such as with LBT women, the Rapporteur emphasized the issues of precarious access to the health system and obstetric violence, the issue of domestic workers, sexual violence, and femicide that disproportionately impacts these women, with which she pondered the need for psychological guidance as a government public policy. The Rapporteur expressed great concern about the data presented that show that black women are more exposed to femicide, highlighting the violence that occurs against black lesbian and trans women. In addition, the criminalization of abortion was noted in their evaluation, in addition to the barriers faced by women who seek even legal abortion, in accordance with the Penal Code. In this regard, she emphasized her concern about the Constitutional Amendment Proposal 1904/2024, which increases the penalties for women who have abortions to up to 20 years in prison. At this point, the importance of the Government implementing the recommendations of the CEDAW Committee, which evaluated Brazil this year, to decriminalize abortion and guarantee safe access for all people, respecting women’s rights and bodily autonomy, was highlighted. Regarding the care economy, she also noted the economic exploitation suffered by domestic workers.

Regarding police violence, the Rapporteur pointed out that Afro-descendant mothers who lose their sons and daughters due to police brutality, in addition to being victims, are also criminalized.  Therefore, her report will emphasize the need for more effective measures to be taken against the prison system and, while acknowledging that the use of police cameras is an important step towards an anti-racist security policy, she pointed out that there are reports that these cameras are not used and that the government is using measures of racial discrimination without scientific basis. In this way, she urged the government to create laws on the use of artificial intelligence so that it is not used in a racist way.

The Special Rapporteur also highlighted spatial segregation, especially in large urban centers, which are mostly occupied by people of African descent and have poor access to infrastructure. In addition, she highlighted the lack of support for people living on the streets.

The advance of the extreme right and the growth of neo-Nazi cells was one of the points of extreme concern of the Rapporteur, who stressed that there is a denial by the state of Santa Catarina about these groups and that affirmative policies and actions must be implemented to strengthen local legislation to combat denialism. From this perspective, she also highlighted her concern about the lack of efforts of the Brazilian legislature in the face of bills that seek to roll back some of the rights already achieved.

Finally, she expressed concern about the growth of gender-based political violence and hate speech and urged the government to take careful measures in this area. She stressed that the low representation of vulnerable groups in decision-making spaces reflects systemic racism. In addition, this lack of representativeness can also be seen within the Judiciary.

Race and Equality thanks Ashiwini K.P. for her support and interest in the Rapporteurship’s commitment to promoting anti-racist and racial justice actions in Brazil. We highlight the importance of the recognition of religious racism as a discriminatory practice before an international human rights mechanism. We continue to fight for the defense and guarantee of human rights to confront the inequalities created by the racist system. The Brazilian State must commit itself to the demands for justice and equity of its population. A government whose proposal is “Union and Reconstruction” must have historical reparation as a priority.

Finally, we share some of the recommendations submitted to the Office of the Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance by Brazilian organizations:

  • Improvement of public policies for access to legal aid and support services for victims of domestic and familial violence, based on a survey of cases registered in recent years, to support and protect women victims of violence and racism (especially religious racism); among other actions, based on the collaboration of feminist groups, religious leaders, public managers, and experts on the subject.
  • Demand the implementation of the National Health Policy for the LGBTI+ Population through the creation of specialized health teams to meet the highly complex demands in the health of lesbian women;
  • Recommend that the Brazilian State effectively address all barriers to justice faced by victims of racist crimes by speeding up prosecutions, revising evidence standards to strengthen accountability for discriminatory acts, and monitoring racial disparities in access to justice, especially for Afro-descendant women and LGBTI+ people.
  • To ask the Brazilian State to seek to adequately implement reparation measures for victims and family members affected by State violence, which should include psychological support, medical assistance, and financial compensation, in addition to others that may be necessary in the analysis of the specific case.
  • Ensure that the Brazilian State also complies with the recommendations prepared by the Committees on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, treaty bodies that recently examined the country and noted similar concerns.
  • To recommend the political participation of indigenous peoples and quilombola communities in the development of public policies that affect their territories and in policies for the defense of the environment. In addition, the Brazilian State must guarantee the demarcation and titling of quilombola and indigenous lands, in addition to rejecting the thesis of the Time-Frame Framework.

 

 

 

 

 

UN liquidity crisis: Rights groups call on States to #PayYourDues

As the United Nations face a historic liquidity crisis due to unpaid dues, civil society urges Member States to fulfill their financial obligations, safeguarding critical human rights operations.

The failure of States to pay their membership dues to the United Nations (UN) in full and on time is causing a financial liquidity crisis for the organisation. According to the UN Secretary-General, the UN faced the highest level of arrears in its history at the end of 2023, the impacts of which are being felt by victims and survivors of human rights violations and abuses. As of 15 April 2024, only 100 UN member States have paid their dues in full. Human rights groups call on all member States to pay their contributions in line with their legal obligations under the UN Charter (article 17, paragraph 2)

The UN as a whole, and the Human Rights Council and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights specifically, have deliberated various measures and proposals to conserve cash, including through freezing the recruitment of staff to mechanisms created by States, and postponements and partial fulfilment of key mandated activities. We remind States that what is being traded off are priorities brought to the UN by human rights defenders and affected populations and agreed to by governments themselves. On the global level, as repeatedly highlighted by the UN Secretary-General, the international human rights system is indispensable to ensure stability by promoting conflict prevention and sustainable development.

The cuts to Special Procedures’ activities, including limitations to the number of country visits and the cancellation of the annual meeting, severely restrict the possibilities for rights holders to directly engage with what has typically been one of the UN’s most accessible mechanisms. It also reduces mandate holders’ access to situations on the ground and the engagement with authorities at the domestic level for positive human rights change and to promote the rights of victims and rights holders.

Decisions forced by the liquidity crisis, among them the announcement of some treaty bodies to cancel pre-sessional working groups and threats to further cancellations including of sessions, are of great concern. Not only would crucial assessments of compliance with the treaties be put on hold, but it would also lead to increased backlogs of both state-party reports for review and exacerbate existing backlogs of individual communications. Attention also needs to be paid to ensuring increased and continuous funding for accessibility for persons with disabilities to allow for their effective participation in all UN treaty bodies.

Investigative mechanisms created to respond to mass atrocities in places including Sudan, Myanmar, Syria, Ukraine, Iran and Israel/OPT, particularly in supporting criminal prosecutions of perpetrators, are already or will be severely hindered in their ability to collect witness and victim testimonies and first-hand accounts through cuts in travel budgets as well as staffing. Many such mechanisms were created following sustained calls for accountability from affected communities themselves, and barriers to their functioning will not only make accountability more remote but will damage the UN’s credibility in addressing such atrocities.

There are real risks that the cash flow crisis will be instrumentalised to impose unnecessary restrictions, particularly on civil society access and participation at the UN. Online and hybrid modalities for participation do not require heavy financial investments, and the gains are meaningful, especially considering factors such as environmental impact, costs of travel, visa restrictions, accessibility for persons with disabilities and the increased risks of reprisals against individuals engaging with the UN.

Finally, the human rights pillar of the UN remains significantly underfunded, receiving only 4% of the regular UN budget. By exacerbating these deficiencies, the UN Member States are sending a clear message that human rights and their implementation are optional and not inalienable. Resolving the cash flow problems this year will not meaningfully or sustainably address the financial challenges of the system’s human rights bodies, mechanisms and processes that are so important to rights holders.

We call on all States to:

  1. Pay their dues to the UN in full and without delay, both now and in future years;
  2. In their deliberations on cost-cutting measures, ensure that all stakeholders are consulted and that a victim-centred approach is taken when considering prioritisation for funding; and
  3. Strengthen the human rights pillar of the UN by substantially increasing its regular budget.

We invite OHCHR to regularly provide civil society with a detailed, accurate and comprehensive picture of the crisis and its impact, as the situation evolves.

Signatories (updated on a rolling basis)*:

  1. 4Métrica
  2. AbibiNsroma Foundation
  3. Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights
  4. ActionAid International
  5. African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies
  6. Albinism Society of Eswatini (ASESWA)
  7. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
  8. Amnesty International
  9. Anti-Slavery International
  10. Ararteko-Ombudsman of the Basque Country
  11. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
  12. Asociación Aquarius Supervivientes
  13. Asociación La Ruta del Clima
  14. Association du Développement et de la Promotion du Développement et de la Promotion de Droits de l’Homme
  15. Association for the Prevention of Torture
  16. AsyLex
  17. BIO VISION AFRICA (BiVA)
  18. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
  19. CAN Latin America (CANLA)
  20. Caribbean Association for Youth Development (CAYD)
  21. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
  22. Center for Reproductive Rights
  23. Center for the Human Rights of Children, Loyola University Chicago
  24. Centre for Citizens Conserving Environment & Management (CECIC)
  25. Centre for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR-Centre)
  26. Centre for Human Rights and Development (CHRD), Mongolia
  27. Centre interdisciplinaire des droits de l’enfant – UCLouvain
  28. Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS)
  29. Centro de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos – Promsex
  30. Child Rights Connect
  31. Child Rights International Network (CRIN)
  32. Children’s Rights Alliance for England, part of Just for Kids Law
  33. CHOICE for youth and sexuality
  34. CIVICUS
  35. CNCD-11.11.11 (Belgium)
  36. Colectivo de Derechos de Infancia y Adolescencia de Argentina
  37. Collective Campaign for Peace (COCAP)
  38. Comité/Club UNESCO Universitaire pour la Lutte Contre la Drogue et autres pandémies (CLUCOD)
  39. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI)
  40. Conectas Direitos Humanos
  41. Convention against Enforced Disappearances Initiative (CEDI)
  42. Coordination des ONG pour les droits de l’enfant
  43. Defence for Children International
  44. Endorois Welfare Council (EWC)
  45. Equality Now
  46. European Network on Statelessness
  47. FIAN International
  48. Franciscans International
  49. Fundación Cónclave Investigativo de las Ciencias Jurídicas Y Sociales (CIJYS)
  50. Geneva Human Rights Platform
  51. Global Detention Project
  52. Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
  53. Greek Helsinki Monitor
  54. Green Development Advocates (GDA)
  55. Human Rights Defenders Network- Sierra Leone
  56. Human Rights Watch
  57. Humanists International
  58. Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion
  59. International Commission of Jurists
  60. International Disability Alliance
  61. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  62. International Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights
  63. International Play Association – Canada
  64. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims
  65. International Service for Human Rights
  66. Irídia – Center for the Defence of Human Rights
  67. Just Fair
  68. Justiça Global
  69. Kindernothilfe e.V.
  70. Legal Literacy – Nepal
  71. LGBT CENTRE MONGOLIA
  72. MENA Rights Group
  73. Minority Rights Group – Greece
  74. Namibia Diverse Women’s Association (NDWA)
  75. NGO for Children Confederation
  76. Omega Research Foundation
  77. Oyu Tolgoi Watch
  78. Plan International
  79. Privacy International
  80. PROMSEX, Centro de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos
  81. Psychological Responsiveness NGO, Mongolia
  82. Rede Nacional de Mulheres Negras no Combate á Violência
  83. Réseau des ONG ACTIVES pour le Contrôle du Tabac en Côte d’Ivoire (ROCTA-CI)
  84. Réseau des Organisations de la Société Civile pour l’Observation et le Suivi des Elections en Guinée – ROSE
  85. Rivers without Boundaries Coalition
  86. Save the Children
  87. Sayanaa Wellbeing Association
  88. Sexual Rights Initiative
  89. Sounds of the Silenced
  90. Southern Africa Region Climate Action Network
  91. Tanzania Child Rights Forum
  92. TB-Net
  93. Terre des Hommes International Federation
  94. The Oil Refinery Residents Association
  95. Transbantu Association Zambia
  96. UCLouvain
  97. Unen khatamj NGO
  98. Universal Rights Group
  99. West African Human Rights Defenders’ Network
  100. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)

Working Group on Arbitrary Detention calls for “full release” of Cuban activist Yandier García Labrada

Washington D.C., April 5, 2024 – “February 27 (2024) was the last time I saw my brother. He was very thin,” says Iran Almaguer Labrada, brother of Cuban activist Yandier Garcia Labrada (39 years old), who appears in the Opinion 68/2023 of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which was made public in mid-March. In the document, the United Nations mechanism requested the “full release” of the human rights defender, who is also a member of the Christian Liberation Movement (MCL).

The Opinion, adopted in the framework of the 98th session of this Working Group, also asks the State of Cuba to compensate and make reparations to García Labrada; to investigate and punish those responsible for his detention; and to provide information on compliance with this “decision” within a period of six months after its publication, which is October 2024.

“On October 6, 2020, my brother was detained for claiming his rights in a queue (line to obtain food and basic necessities). A repressor pushed him and assaulted him, and then more State Security agents arrived and called the police. He was shouting ‘Down with the dictatorship’,” Almaguer says.

Yandier García Labrada is serving a five-year sentence for the crimes of contempt for authority and propagation of epidemics. Since the beginning of his imprisonment, he has been transferred to various prisons and has suffered isolation, transfers to punishment cells, denial of medical attention, and restrictions on communication with his family members. Since January 19, 2023, he has been held in the Guabineyón 8 correctional work center in the province of Las Tunas. The prison authorities have denied him the benefits of home visits and parole, even though he meets the regulatory requirements.

His brother Iran Almaguer, who suffers from a disease called retinitis pigmentosa which has led him to blindness, says that Yandier Garcia lived with his mother in the municipality of Manatí, in Las Tunas; and since he has been deprived of his freedom, she has suffered serious health problems. “She is hypertensive and has Alzheimer’s disease”.

From the Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality), the organization that referred the case of García Labrada to the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, we demand that the State of Cuba comply with the request made by this United Nations mechanism, in its Opinion number 68/2023. We call for the immediate release of this Cuban activist, who has been unjustly deprived of his liberty for more than three years, as well as all those who remain imprisoned for demanding their rights in this country. We demand that Cuba respect, protect and guarantee the human rights of all its inhabitants, without discrimination of any kind.

We also call on the international community to follow up on compliance with this Opinion, and to continue to condemn the human rights violations occurring on the island.

Join Our Efforts

Help empower individuals and communities to achieve structural changes in Latin America.

Donate Contact Us